Monday, March 12, 2012

Loss

One of our well respected, and well liked surgeons, lost his young daughter to a fluke virus over the weekend. The people who have children seem to be taking it much harder, as one would expect. I sense the enormity of it, knowing no words are of any use at all. Grief overwhelms, the loss engulfs even the peripheral observers. It's not my grief, but my tears swell in sympathy. Every death elicits tears from me, always has. Not exactly for those gone, absolutely for those left to mourn.

All of my experience has been with death in adults, I know what to say when someone has lost a grandparent, or even a spouse. But a young child, there is no comfort, no solace. I think about granny, born herself in 1890, who bore ten children, with only six reaching adulthood. A single child dead, the twins dead, all in their first year. Another died within a week. Then the oldest, a son, drowned at 16. She was expected to get over it and get on with it. I don't know if that's good, or helpful, or cruel. Certainly her fervent religious beliefs provided her reasons and consolations. If I'd been her, and believed in a god that had taken those children, I'd've taken it personally, and as proof this was no god worth the trouble.

But to even consider the function of justice in the death of children seems to me a gross affront to how life works. There is no injustice in viruses, or bacteria, causing death. Fairness doesn't enter into it. Goodness is a poor weapon against septic shock, even with proper medical care. No one past the age of twenty should ever whine "but it's not fair!" No, it's not, so? Crying over rain when I wanted to play outdoors didn't get me anything but a red nose and a headache. A high school friend of mine got in touch a number of years back. After a while she told me about her young son, who died because of a car accident, her fault, and he was not in a seatbelt. No tidy moral will make a damn bit of difference there, won't revive the dead or assuage the remorse. No murdered child lives again once the killer is caught, or executed. Any more than 90 years wasted gets another shot at it. One lifetime, that's it, a day or a century, same thing.

We want to see causes, cures, solutions. There are none here. There is only the love we keep alive, the life we continue with - once the worst of the shock passes. Only the laughter will break up the thick concrete grief that will never be gone, only cracked and covered with leaves.

6 comments:

English Rider said...

I'm imagining that this would be doubly hard for a physician. So used to finding solutions and reversing negative outcomes. This must shake him to his core.
All you can do is say you are sorry for his loss and forgive him any outbursts in the coming months.

julia said...

what a beautiful, and shocking, post.

All I can think is that it is against all that is natural and all that is fair for a parent to bury a child, and yet it happens

Joan said...

(o)

Lucy said...

The idea that parents won't, or shouldn't, survive children must be a modern one; for most of human history they frequently did, as your granny's story shows, which can't have made it much easier, I suppose.

These are good compassionate words, Z.

Phil Plasma said...

Indeed, fairness resides in the child's domain. I don't think it should be so, but what can be done.

Your frank attitude concerning death is refreshing. I prefer the term 'dead' as compared to 'passed away'. Deceased would do in polite circles.

Symapthies to your surgeon and his family.

Pacian said...

You have your head screwed on straight, Z.