

It's that time of year, and the sun streams in upon felines.


We the people are whole beings who cannot and will not be reduced to parts. As a country, our responsibility to ourselves and the freedom we hold so dear is to understand how we are complete. Our American sensibilities and culture have taught us all to be a community, looking out for one another, standing together against enemies both foreign and domestic.
For that reason, it is imperative to note that the majority of the protests, the marches, and the influx of ordinary people attending extraordinary town hall meetings are a grass roots, organic effort to stand for the values we feel make America so great.
Seeing the American people band together under the banner of hope and stability has been beautiful. Being a part of a movement which values individuals coming together is inspiring. There is a reason why so many still choose to flock here and make America their home.

We're getting it from all the times we've heard 'throws like a girl", "crying like a little girl"; calling football players "Ladies" when the coach is displeased with the players, hearing "weak as a woman", telling boys as an insult they should "go play with their dollies"; saying women are "PMS'ing" when they are acting any way but happy .....shall I go on?
For many years, I have thought the never-will-be-done answer was to have storefront schools. One room schoolhouses, two teachers and a local adult volunteer, no more than a dozen students, all online classes - a national, self paced, curricula. Touring experts and scholars for special lectures and demonstrations. Kid has a problem with a particular teacher, move 'em to the next neighborhood over. Walking distances from their homes, field trips common (easier to arrange with small groups), flexible schedules (let the teens sleep in). A circle of homeschools in rural areas instead of warehouses to haul whole populations into.
Yeah, yeah, there can be sponsored team sports, and credits to families for music or art or individual athletics. Those schools can become colleges and libraries and social meeting space. Clubs and dances and charities coming out their ears if they want.
It'll never happen, but it could work. If anyone cared enough to change everything.
"In any story worth tellin', that knows about the way of the world, the third wish is the one that undoes the harm the first two wishes caused."-T. Pratchett
— Granny Weatherwax




So, I didn't come up with art for the Resistance magazine in time for submission before the deadline. But I did come up with something to share with you (attached). It's more of an application of an old idea with a revived expression, but the pink ears are there, anyway. The equation is a hamiltonian solution to the schrodinger wave equation for a quantum well. The reference to the superlattice applies in that a superlattice is comprised of a series of quantum wells, and electrons that would classically be trapped in individual quantum wells are instead following quantum mechanics and are found to be on both sides of their respective barriers.
The cat was observed by schrodinger and used by him in his thought experiment regarding a particle in a box. The cat lives, does not belong to Schrodinger, does not reside in a box, and thinks for itself between its own pink ears.
So there you have it. My thoughts on quantum confinement, overcoming barriers, and cats with pink ears!

February 1, 2017
President Donald J. Trump The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President,
Over two years ago, faith leaders across the nation wrote to President Obama, urging him not to include a religion exemption in an Executive Order ending discrimination against LGBT people in hiring by federal contractors. As faith and civic leaders who affirm the sacred dignity and equal worth of every person, we are now writing to you. We urge you not to undermine these important protections against discrimination by adding a religious exemption to the Executive Order. For more than two years, it has been the law of the land. It would be harmful and wrong for you to change federal policy to sanction discrimination with tax-payer dollars. Furthermore, we urge you not to include religious exemptions that discriminate against LGBT people, women, and others in any federal policies.
In our democratic nation, public service—particularly when it is directly funded by the federal government—must be aligned with the constitutional principle that all people receive equal treatment under the law. Requiring those who receive public funding to adhere to non-discriminatory hiring practices not only abides by this principle, but also it is the right thing to do. Beyond that, it protects our laws from confusion and abuse. If contractors and others were allowed to opt out of certain laws, depending on their religious beliefs, we would soon see a morass of legal confusion and dispute.
In addition, if a religious exemption were added to President Obama’s Executive Order, the people who would suffer most are those who always suffer most when discrimination is allowed: individuals and communities that are already marginalized. Adding to their burden is the opposite of what public service can and should do—and betrays the values we stand for as people of faith and conscience.
Federal policies that allow for discrimination against LGBT people violate basic human rights and dignity, as well as the belief shared by millions of Americans—that LGBT people should not be treated as second-class citizens.
In a nation as diverse as the United States, the federal government must follow—and indeed, must model—equitable and fair employment practices. Our mutual commitment to the common good is best served by policies that prohibit discrimination based on factors that have no relation to job performance. We are better and stronger as a nation when hiring decisions are based on professional merit.
Our pluralistic nation is among the most religiously diverse and devout in the world. Each day we make progress on our journey toward “a more perfect union,” where all God’s children are treated with dignity and respect. Many forces help spur this progress. They include the courage of people who live openly as who they truly are; the witness of faith leaders who provide a compass for religious growth; the commitment of political leaders who help guide our nation toward a more just path; and the passage of laws and policies that ensure fair treatment for all.
We believe that the path to national unity lies in affirming the full equality and potential of every person. In the spirit of equality, fairness, and justice, we urge you not to add a discriminatory religious exemption to the Executive Order or to other federal policies.
In Faith,*
James Hacker: Humphrey, I'm worried.I keep hearing this, including at work yesterday, the resentment against artists speaking out on politics.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Oh, what about, Prime Minister?
James Hacker: About the Americans.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Oh yes, well, we're all worried about the Americans.
The signs of popular dissent from President Trump’s opening volley of actions have been plain to see on the nation’s streets, at airports in the aftermath of his refugee and visa ban, and in the blizzard of outrage on social media. But there’s another level of resistance to the new president that is less visible and potentially more troublesome to the administration: a growing wave of opposition from the federal workers charged with implementing any new president’s agenda.
Less than two weeks into Trump’s administration, federal workers are in regular consultation with recently departed Obama-era political appointees about what they can do to push back against the new president’s initiatives. Some federal employees have set up social media accounts to anonymously leak word of changes that Trump appointees are trying to make.
And a few government workers are pushing back more openly, incurring the wrath of a White House that, as press secretary Sean Spicer said this week about dissenters at the State Department, sends a clear message that they “should either get with the program, or they can go.”
At a church in Columbia Heights last weekend, dozens of federal workers attended a support group for civil servants seeking a forum to discuss their opposition to the Trump administration. And 180 federal employees have signed up for a workshop next weekend, where experts will offer advice on workers’ rights and how they can express civil disobedience.
At the Justice Department, an employee in the division that administers grants to nonprofits fighting domestic violence and researching sex crimes said the office has been planning to slow its work and to file complaints with the inspector general’s office if asked to shift grants away from their mission.
“You’re going to see the bureaucrats using time to their advantage,” said the employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. Through leaks to news organizations and internal complaints, he said, “people here will resist and push back against orders they find unconscionable.”
The resistance is so early, so widespread and so deeply felt that it has officials worrying about paralysis and overt refusals by workers to do their jobs.
Asked whether federal workers are dissenting in ways that go beyond previous party changes in the White House, Tom Malinowski, who was President Barack Obama’s assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor, said, sarcastically: “Is it unusual? . . . There’s nothing unusual about the entire national security bureaucracy of the United States feeling like their commander in chief is a threat to U.S. national security. That happens all the time. It’s totally usual. Nothing to worry about.”
The permanent bureaucracy, the backbone of the federal government and the bulwark against many presidents’ activist intentions, is designed to be at least a step removed from the crosswinds of partisan politics.
But for years, many conservatives have argued that the federal bureaucracy is stacked against them, making it harder for them to get things done even when they control the White House, Congress or both.