Saturday, February 08, 2014

Pope



Well, I have known my share of crispy nurses. Found this over at Arbroath.



Not lovely, but oh so much less red. No longer vaguely afraid my face will explode off in a puff of dry, itchy skin. Not cheap, even with insurance, but think how much I've saved not wearing cosmetics all these years, and it evens out. Really remarkable improvement, even if the photo doesn't show it.

Watching a show about Pope Joan last night. I'd thought it pretty much debunked, but apparently there still seems to be ambiguity, which feels right. The story as told is almost certainly urban* legend, so pat and with a twist at the end. But that women got into church positions, over two millennia, seems inevitable. That one made it to pope is also rather likely, although not as the tale goes. More like James Barry, a British Army Surgeon who lived male, but who's body was at least technically female.

What I suspect is that s/he was not clearly male or female, not wholly either. Most cultures don't have a tick box for Other. Or, A Bit of Both. No matter how much needed. Pope Joan the story, expressed the anxieties of a female hating institution. Pope Joan the real person may have been ambiguous, passing even in her/his own mind, only 'discovered' after death. Perhaps more than one. The odd bishop and cardinal as well. More than a few monks and priests in every generation, I would think, although kept quiet and hidden.

And most of us, perhaps all of us, are not at those extreme ends in all ways. Good, because there is no balance out there. Humans are both, in order to be full human. We don't belong in boxes with clear labels, no escape. Trapping both the jailor and prisoner, inside and out.

I have a female body, no question. I am only attracted to men, although I had mild, vague crushes on a couple of women when I was younger and in love with the world. I have the weak and feeble spacial skills of a female, sadly. Never had any use for dolls, although I adored stuffed animals. Hated pink, and had no interest in most of the girl-toy aisle, preferring the baby toys, games, or building blocks and balls. The boy aisle, all OD green and brown with explosions and war scenes and models in dull colors, held even less appeal, save for the cars and train sets.

I can talk squishy emotions with the best of 'em, (how else could I have made it through much of nursing school?) but I prefer talk with content. This is, I'm sure, why I don't get chatting about food and babies, nor sports for that matter. It's bonding talk, making sounds to join in. I get that, can only stand so much before I want to add that what they are talking about it actually an urban legend… or somehow misunderstood. Sometimes, I manage to resist.

We are all such mixes, what else would we be? Both parents, and whatever siblings had that womb before us left traces, antibodies, graffiti on the walls. To be fully human is to be both, and neither, swirled together as uniquely as our strands of genes. Bespoke.

All this in response to several insightful and intelligent posts over at flask's place.


Anyway, each one of us is a true and genuine pope.



(Yes, I do carry one of these.)



*Vatican City is certainly urban.

8 comments:

flask said...

aw, shucks. that's sweet of you.

and hooray about your face.

Friko said...

Looking much better already.

Not so sure about everybody having a bit of everything. You mean us sharing DNA with all manner of creatures, yes?
And only having a teeny bit of our very own?

Zhoen said...

Friko,
We are from both our mother and father, XX&XY chromosomes. We don't just get all the female traits if we are female, after all. Sons look like their mums.

And there is evidence that previous children have an effect on subsequent ones, leaving a mother with antibodies and hormonal responses she did not have with the first. Beyond the known issue of RH factor.

We all have the same set of sex hormones, in varying proportions. Both sexes work off the same structural template, with variations developing after.


I never mentioned other critters, not sure where I confused you.

the polish chick said...

ha! i could talk about food for hours. it's content to me, but i know some who would disagree.

babies, well, i had no use for the topic until i came into the possession of some actual babies (3 at last count, and as of yesterday morning, 2 confirmed on the way!) and now i can talk about those as well.

sports? why in the hell would *anyone* want to talk about that nonsense? the only flaw in my otherwise wonderful roommate is that on occasion he tries to initiate conversations about sports.

yay for face!

Zhoen said...

pc,
It depends on how. The chemistry of food has content, each person listing foods they love and the other saying "yeah, I love that too" then listing another food, pretty much chit chat. Data on early childhood development, content. Listing the cute thing baby did, oooing over cute thing, adding another cute thing … chit and chat. Discussing concussion syndrome in US football, content. Swapping stats on favorite teams, chit chat.

Sort of like playing the card game War. Slap, slap, slap, slap, take cards. Friendly, spending time together. Nothing wrong with that, not at all. I just have limited tolerance for it, especially with people I'm not fond of to start with.

FARMGAL said...

Crispy nurse... there are for sure some of those, hope I never become one. Made me laugh.

Zhoen said...

FG,
My face was making me feel like a Crispy Nurse.

You are good at both content and chat conversation, which I appreciate, lemme tell ya.

Phil Plasma said...

(o)